Aircraft Temperatures
Early
in the MERRA reanalysis period, aircraft observations are sparse, but
increase in time, eventually providing a significant amount of
conventional observations. Cardinali et al. (2003) identified biases in
aircraft temperature observations, and Ballish and Kumar (2008) further
examined the biases in each type of commercial aircraft. Figure 1 shows
an 2001-2009 mean bias between collocated aircraft and radiosonde 200mb
temperature, over the United States. Almost everywhere, aircraft are
warmer than the radiosonde observations.
Figure 1 Collocated aircraft/RAOB at 200mb temperature (K) differences assimilated in MERRA averaged from 2001-2012. (computed from the differences of each observaitons background departure) |
Figure
2 shows the monthly mean difference between collocated radiosonde and
aircraft observations assimilated in MERRA over the U. S., while the
dots show the number of collocations (thou/yr). While the data for
these figures are binned and gridded, area and monthly averaging include
weighting for the number of observations. Early in the reanalysis,
there are lower numbers of aircraft observations, and the differences
reflect that with more monthly variability. In 1990-1991, increasing
number of observations increase the distribution of data, and the warm bias converges. After 1996, there is an exaggeration in the annual cycle,
where the summer aircraft observations get even warmer. However, every month is a positive difference.
The
increasing number of collocations reflects the increase in availability
of aircraft observations. There are many more aircraft observations
being assimilated away from the vicinity of the radiosondes. The number
of observations then influences the data assimilation, where the
analysis is drawn toward the aircraft data. Figure 3 shows the time
series of background departure for collocated radiosonde and aircraft 200mb
temperature. As the aircraft observations increase in number, their background departure decreases (this also holds for the RMS of the background departure).
Both
Cardinali et al (2003) and Ballish and Kumar (2008) have suggested bias
corrections for commercial aircraft temperature data, using more
limited comparisons than these. ECMWF has implemented a bias correction
in their forecast system.
No comments:
Post a Comment